dust devil in Afghanistan

SANDSTORMS, AFGHANISTAN

Sand Storm, Afghanistan

I can’t imagine being in these elements under “normal” conditions let alone on a battlefield. The wind is bad enough; it can be tiring on its own, add the blowing sand and that’s a mixture for a miserable experience.  I’ve also heard that the sand there is different as far as texture and AMOUNT are concerned. Dubbed the “sandbox” by troops, this name may have derived from its namesake experienced during Boot Camp.

Upon researching the sandstorms that plague that region of the world, I came across an article that peaked my curiosity, and I have to say I’m not at all surprised this issue is hush hush. This is the first time I’ve heard about this.

The following is from an article written on June 28, 2010. Once again I’m disappointed in the transparency of our government. 

U.S. troops already face plenty of threats in Afghanistan: AK-47–wielding insurgents, improvised bombs, an intransigent and incompetent government. Now add a less familiar challenge to that list of woes: Afghanistan’s toxic sand.

i_hate_sand_funny_military_grunge_army_boots_sticker-r5f3a17f457ef44df858448b84bde662d_v9waf_8byvr_512The pulverized turf, it turns out, contains high levels of manganese, silicon, iron, magnesium, aluminum, chromium and other metals that act as neurotoxic agents when ingested. Combine the country’s frequent sandstorms and the kicked-up dust that results from helicopter travel with troops’ nostrils, mouths and pores, and you’ve got an unexpected example of how inhospitable the terrain is for the soon-to-be 98,000 soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines fighting the war.

That’s all according to new research presented this month to a neurotoxicology conference in Oregon by a senior scientist with the Navy Environmental Health Effects Laboratory. That scientist, Palur G. Gunasekar, tells Politics Daily‘s Sheila Kaplan that “[a]s the sand extract dose increases at the higher concentration you see cell death.” As the late Ronnie James Dio told us time and again, metal is evil.

According to Pro Publica, Congress has dedicated an estimated $1.7 billion over the last few years to help troops recover from traumatic brain injuries, even standing up six new “Defense Centers of Excellence” in 2007 to provide research support as well as medical care.

But now it looks like there’s a new, tragic and expensive unintended health consequence of the war. And if the Defense Department’s late start in combating traumatic brain injuries is instructive, it’s going to take a lot more than research and the glacial pace of the defense health bureaucracy to deal with neurotoxic sand.

A September 2009 Defense Department overview of its anti-TBI efforts (.PDF) to date found that grappling with the scope of such a multifaceted health problem required “collaborative efforts” with “state-of-the-art science, technology and knowledge-based outcomes.” And the Department still isn’t there yet, years later.

Until something like that kicks into gear for toxic sand, troops are going to be left on their own to mitigate their exposure, so that may mean enterprising commanders ordering their troops to wear black sunglasses and face masks this summer in the Afghan desert. If there’s any upside to a covered face in baking heat, at least it’ll look pretty metal.

SOURCE:   Afghanistan’s toxic sand

US Troops in an Afghan sandstorm

Sangin sandstorm 05/ 05/ 2011

4 thoughts on “Afghanistan’s Toxic Sand

  1. Hi! You’re welcome, and thank you for your comment-this is good information to have. Although they say the “minerals are good for us” in terms of being refined, in my opinion is not a good enough reason to send our young men and women to war to either die or come back ill and turn a deaf ear when they ask for help. I’m not at all surprised with your information. I’m going to research it and become familiar with this. Thanks again for sharing and for reading my blog. 🙂

    Like

  2. Great Post and a huge thank you for sharing. If you also read into what your talking about as far as the additives in the Sand, is another reason, that the US Govt, continues this war. These are also very vital substances when extracted and re born into many food, machinery, medical (prescriptions) Range Feeds as well, which are hugely part of Oil Companies such as CHS. CHS is Livestock feed and Oil Supplies. Russian weapons in these regions are no surprise in many of the conflicts we find ourselves in across the world. Russia gives as does China and North Korea weapons for mining and Oil Rights. It’s a sad story and true. The truth is we can not continue a rate of growth (GDP) without having more access to these types of minerals and nutrients. As though they may be toxic in the Sand, they are as stated above. This continuation of War, is so multifaceted it is not believable to the normal person. Well said, So much for transparency of our Government. \

    Timothy Roth

    Like

  3. You’re welcome. Let others know too. The more who know the better, our veterans need us to be their voice. Thanks for visiting my blog. 🙂

    Like

Comments are now closed.